IN THE HI 204 Maharshi Da Manisha CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. aside of imp the learned A the petitione by the learne 2. defendants infructuous No. CS-867 respondent/p Judge (Senio 3. learned coun 4. disposed of, 5. 21.04.2026 rishu E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H CR-24 Date o shi Dayanand University and another Versus M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Nilesh Kant Goyal, Advoca Mr. AS Virk, Advocate for the p Mr. Kartar Singh Malik-I, Advo I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition h impugned judgment dated 20.03.20 rned Additional District Judge, Rohtak titioners against the order dated 18.10 learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), At the very outset, learned submits that the present revisio tuous and may be disposed of as su 867-2021 titled as 8Manisha vs. M dent/plaintiff has been dismissed in (Senior Division), Rohtak vide order d Copy of order dated 15.01.20 d counsel for the petitioners is taken on In view of the above, the ed of, as having been rendered infruc Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2459-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.04.2026 other .& Petitioners .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA dvocate for or the petitioners. , Advocate for the respondent. ition has been filed seeking setting .03.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by Rohtak, whereby the appeal filed by 18.10.2021 (Annexure P-2) passed ision), Rohtak, was dismissed. arned counsel for the petitioner/ revision petition has been rendered such as, the main suit bearing MDU and others9 filed by the in default by the learned Civil order dated 15.01.2026. .01.2026 handed over in Court by ken on record. the present revision petition is infructuous. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No tting d by d by ssed / ered ring the ivil t by n is RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.22 13:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.