ROHIT SURESH PATHARIKAR v. SAGAR RAJU MURTADKAR AND ANOTHER
APPLN/4262/2026 · 2026-10-16
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21019 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21019 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 - aba1892.26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
937 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1892 OF 2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4262 OF 2026 IN ABA/1892/2026 Sagar Raju Murtadkar ….Applicant VERSUS The State of Maharashtra …..Respondent Mr. S. N. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Applicant Ms. R. R. Tandale, APP for the State. Mr. N. B. Narwade, Advocate for the informant.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2026.
PER COURT :
1. After hearing learned Counsel for both sides and when this Court has shown disinclination to grant relief to the Applicant,
learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Application.
2. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Pending application, if any, does not survive and stands
disposed of.
( R. M. JOSHI, J.)
dyb