Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21017 (CAL)

ANIL KUMAR JHA v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

WPA/6190/2026 · 2026-05-20

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2 2200..0055..22002266 Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 6190 of 2026 Anil Kumar Jha Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Dr. Bishnupada Dutta Mr. Amiya Dey …for the petitioner 1. Matter is accommodated in the list under the heading ‘To Be Mentioned’ on being mentioned by the learned advocate representing petitioner. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits on instruction that petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. 3. Respondents are not represented. 4. In view of such submission made on behalf of the petitioner writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of non prosecution. 5. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to take steps in accordance with law. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 7. Parties to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)