The Vizagapatnam Diocesan Corporation Pvt Ltd v. Poosarla Subba Rao
AS/14/2007 · 2026-02-03
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21016 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21016 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010258812007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 14/2007 Between:
1. THE VIZAGAPATNAM DIOCESAN CORPORATION PVT LTD, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR
...APPELLANT AND
1. POOSARLA SUBBA RAO, S/O LATE THAMMANNA R/O D.NO.22-62- 1, GAJULA VEEDHI, TOWN HALL ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM
2. POOSARLA THAMMANNA, S/O SUBBA RAO R/O D.NO.22-62-1, GAJULA VEEDHI, TOWN HALL ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM
3. POOSARLA NARASIMHA RAO, S/O THAMMANNA R/O D.NO.15-11- 19, SIVALAYAM STREET, BHIMUNIPATNAM
4. POOSARLA CHINA THANAMMA SETTY, S/O NARASIMHA RAO R/O D.NO.15-11-19, SIVALAYAM STREET, BHIMUNIPATNAM
5. POOSARLA RAMA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO R/O D.NO.15-11-19, SIVALAYAM STREET, BHIMUNIPATNAM
6. POOSARLA NARENDRA, S/O LATE SUBBA RAO R/O D.NO.49-14- 9/2, LALITHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
7. POOSARLA RAMA SETTY, S/O NARASIMHA SETTY R/O Q.NO.25/D, TYPE-II, S.E.RLY, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM
8. POOSARLA SRIKANTH, S/O LATE KRISHNA SETTY R/O 49-14- 16/2, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
9. POOSARLA MANGAMANI, W/O LATE KRISHNA SETTY R/O 49-14- 16/2, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
10. POOSARLA MANGAMANI, W/O LATE KRISHNA SETTY R/O 49-14- 16/2, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
11. POOSARLA NARASARAJU, W/O SRIRAMAMURTHY HOUSEWIFE R/O D.NO.49-14-16, LALITHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM -16
12. POOSARLA KANNA RAJU, W/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY R/O 128, 1 BLOCK, VIDYANARAYANAPURA LAYOUT, BANGALORE
13. POOSARLA KUMAR, S/O KANNA RAJU R/O 128, 1 BLOCK, VIDYANARAYANAPURA LAYOUT, BANGALORE
14. POOSARLA CHITTIBABU, S/O LAT SRIRAMAMURTHY R/O D.NO.49-14-16, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
15. POOSARLA SUBBA RAO, S/O ACHUTA RAO R/O D.NO.49-14-16, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
16. POOSARLA VENKATA APPA RAO, S/O LATE ACHUTA RAO R/O D.NO.49-14-16, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
17. POOSARLA NAGA VENKATA RANGANTHA GUPTA, S/O LATE ACHUTHA RAO R/O D.NO.49-14-16, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
18. POOSARLA NARAYANA RAO, S/O LAT ACHUTA RAO R/O D.NO.49-14-16, LALITHANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the Judgement and decree in OS No.55/2001 dated 25/07/2006 on the file of the VI Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam.
IA NO: 1 OF 2007(ASMP 40 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant temporary injunction restraining the respondents herein from alienating, encumbering, mortgaging or dealing within any manner with the suit schedule property including altering or changing the suit schedule land
pending disposal of the above appeal pending disposal of the above appeal Schedule property All that plot vacant aland surrounded by compound wall on three sides measuring 2258 sq.yds situated in Patta No.39 S.No.8/A2 of Donaparthi Village, Allipuram Ward in the limits of Municipal Corporation of Visakhapatnam IA NO: 2 OF 2007(ASMP 41 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To send the for the follwong documents i) income tax clearance certificate dated 19.10.2000 ii) Draft sale deed iii) All the I.As filed in OS No.55/2001 on the file of the VI Addl. District Judge, Visakhapatnam more particularly the documents annexed to the IA filed on 21.12.2002. IA NO: 4 OF 2007(ASMP 1673 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in ASMP No. 40/07 in AS No. 14/07 dt. 17- 01-07 Counsel for the Appellant:
1. Y SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. R A CHARY
2. 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 14/2007 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
No representation for the appellant. 2. The matter pertains to the year 2007 and is listed under the caption ‘old matters’. The cause-list mentions that the old matters may not be adjourned. 3.
In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for ‘want of prosecution’. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
_____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J
Dated: 04.02.2026 AG
135 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
APPEAL SUIT NO: 14/2007
Dated: 04.02.2026 AG