Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21015 (PNJ)

MACNEILL ENGINEERING LTD v. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL), KARNAL CUM CONTROLLING AUTHORITY

CWP/17566/2026 · 2026-05-27

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-17566 connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the 2) M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the 3) M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others 4) M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the 17566-2026 (O&M) & connected cases -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. Versus The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. Versus The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. Versus The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. Versus The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17566-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 ….Petitioner The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ayment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others ….Respondents CWP-17598-2026 (O&M) ….Petitioner The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ayment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others ….Respondents CWP-17633-2026 (O&M) ….Petitioner The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others ….Respondents CWP-17667-2026 (O&M) ….Petitioner The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ayment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others ….Respondents .2026 The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling s The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ….Respondents The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ….Respondents The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ….Respondents AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-17566 connected cases 5) M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the 6) M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. permission to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, by filing statutory appeal(s) against the impugned order. 2. 3. 4. accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, within a month from today, the Appellate Authority shall consider 17566-2026 (O&M) & connected cases -2 M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. Versus Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others M/s Macneill Engineering Ltd. Versus The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate, and Mr. Subhash Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, and Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate, for respondent No.2 in all cases. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner s permission to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, by filing statutory appeal(s) against the impugned order. The asked for request is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn, with the libe However, in the event, the petitioner prefers an appeal accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, within a month from today, the Appellate Authority shall consider 2- CWP-17671-2026 (O&M) ….Petitioner Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ayment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others ….Respondents CWP-17676-2026 (O&M) ….Petitioner The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ayment of Gratuity Act, Karnal and others ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Raj Kaushik, Advocate, and Mr. Subhash Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate, and for respondent No.2 in all cases. earned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, by filing statutory appeal(s) against The asked for request is accepted. with the liberty as prayed for. However, in the event, the petitioner prefers an appeal(s), accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, within a month from today, the Appellate Authority shall consider and decide the same, Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ….Respondents The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Karnal cum Controlling ….Respondents eeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Appellate Authority, by filing statutory appeal(s) against , accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, within a month the same, AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-17566 connected cases keeping in view the fact that this Court 5. connected cases. 27.05.202 Ak Sharma 17566-2026 (O&M) & connected cases -3 keeping in view the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the matter before this Court, most expeditiously. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 3- the petitioner was pursuing the matter before A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No the petitioner was pursuing the matter before A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of AMIT KUMAR 2026.05.29 16:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document