1 ( 2026:HHC:35829 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 748 of 2026 Decided on: 24.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Meena Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tarun Brakta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate, for respondent No. 4. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for respondent No. 4 has placed on record pension payment order (PPO) of the petitioner and states that the judgment under reference stands duly complied with. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:35829 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, the respondent/department is directed to take further action in the matter in accordance with law within a period of two weeks. 3. The contempt petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also pending application(s), if any. 4. However, in case the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to revive the contempt petition. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 24th August, 2026 Judge (raman)