IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.14869 of 2026 Decided on: 27th August, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yog Raj …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Jiya Lal, Advocate vice Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive reliefs:- “(i) That the impugned Annexure P-1, order dated 12.08.2025 contained in Annexure P-4, order dated 25.05.2024 contained in Annexure P-3 and copy of order dated 27.05.2025 contained in Annexure P-8 are liable to be set aside/quashed alongwith agreement/compromise dated 27.05.2024 contained in Annexure P-9 may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) That the respondent No.4 may kindly be directed to allot land to the petitioner from front portion of Khasra No.48 as per entitlement of the petitioner by issuing a writ of mandamus. (iii) That or in alternative, the land of Khasra No.48 should be kept joint and the respondent No.4 may kindly be directed to do so by issuing a writ of mandamus.” 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner intends to avail some other appropriate remedy as may be available to him in law for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua August 27, 2026 Judge Mukesh