ADEEBA ANWAR v. UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
SPA/87/2026 · 2026-04-06
Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2101 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2101 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:2392-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY
6th April, 2026
Special Appeal No. 87 of 2026
Adeeba Anwar
------Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others -----Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:-
Mr. T.A.Khan, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. Vinay Bhatt,
learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Pankaj Migalani, learned counsel for the respondent no.1/Public Service Commission. Mr.B.S.Parihar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.2.
JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
1.
The present intra court appeal is directed against the order dated 17.03.2026, passed in WPSS No. 739 of 2026, by which, learned Single Judge, while entertaining the writ petition filed by the appellant has invited counter affidavit and has fixed 30.04.2026 as the next date.
2.
The impugned order does not decide any right of the parties nor even any issue of moment, and, therefore, in our considered opinion, the present intra court appeal is not maintainable. It is open to the appellant to move application for early fixation of date in the writ petition, if so advised. 1
2026:UHC:2392-DB
3.
With the aforesaid observations, the appeal is dismissed.
4.
Pending application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 06.04.2026 Kaushal
2