Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21007 (KAR)

SMT. GOWRAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/1060/2026 · 2026-06-09

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27568 WP NO.1060 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.1060 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. GOWRAMMA D/O LATE SIDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/AT 54, H. MOGENAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, ERSTWHILE RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT - 562 160. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, 1ST FLOOR, DISTRICT OFFICE COMPLEX, B.M. ROAD, RAMANAGAR - 562 159. 3. THE TAHSILDAR CHANNAPATNA TALUK, ERSTWHILE RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT - 562 160. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27568 WP NO.1060 OF 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 17TH OCTOBER, 2025 ISSUED IN CASE NO.LND/CR/487/2025(850421) BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3-TAHSILDAR VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ALSO THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2-DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DATED 20TH JULY, 2024 IN COMPUTER NO.345019 VIDE ANNEXURE-D INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED AT ITEM NO.4 OF ANNEXURE-1 IN RESPECT OF THE LAND IN QUESTION IN SURVEY NO.254 TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE OF H. MOGENAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNAPATNA TALUK; DIRECT THE RESPONDNETS TO REGULARISE THE LAND IN SURVEY NO.254 MEASURING 1 ACRE OF H. MOGENAHALLI IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITONER AS PER FROM NO.53 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner is challenging the Endorsement dated 17th October, 2025 (Annexure-C) issued by the respondent No.3-Tahsildar and order dated 20th July, 2024 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner in respect of the subject land bearing Survey No.254 measuring 1 acre situate at H. Mogenahalli Village, Channapatna Taluk, Bengaluru South District. 2. Heard Sri. A. Nagarajappa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Spoorthy Hegde N., - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27568 WP NO.1060 OF 2026 learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for respondents. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the impugned order dated 20th July, 2024 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, the same would indicate that the petitioner herein has filed application seeking regularisation of of the subject land and the said application came to be rejected on the ground that the son of the applicant was a retired Government servant. Taking into consideration the provision contained under Rule 108F of the Karnataka Land Revenue Rules, 1966, I am of the view that the reason assigned by the respondent-Authorities, rejecting the application made by the petitioner is incorrect. Therefore, the matter requires to be remitted back to the respondent-Authorities for consideration afresh. Accordingly, I pass the following: O R D E R (i) Writ Petition allowed; (ii) Order dated 20th July, 2024 (Annexure-D) passed by the respondent No.2, rejecting the application made by the petitioner in respect - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27568 WP NO.1060 OF 2026 of the subject land mentioned at Sl.No.4 of the Annexure-1 therein is hereby set-aside, consequently endorsement dated 17th October, 2025 (Annexure0C) by the respondent No.3 is quashed; (iii) The matter is remitted back to the respondent-Authorities to re-consider the issue afresh and take decision in the matter, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in terms of provisions contained under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and Rules thereunder. SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 79