APHC010247012018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10882/2018 Between: 1. THE PALLIVURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS SARPANCH D.DHARMA RAO, S/O.CHINNAVADU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.PALLIVURU VILLAGE, VAJRAPUKOTTURU MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VAJRAPUKOTTUR MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in attempting to grant house site pattas in Sy.No.213 of an extent of Ac.4-29 cents situated in Pallivuru Village, Vajrapukottur Mandal, Srikakulam District as illegal, arbitrary, unjust 2 and besides contrary to G.O.Ms.No.187 Revenue (Assn.I) Department, dated. 27.05.2015 being violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents herein not to issue house site pattas in the land in Sy.No.213 of an extent of Ac.4-29 cents situated in Pallivuru Village, Vajrapukottur Mandal, Srikakulam District. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein not to interfere and encroach into the petitioners property in Sy.No.213 of an extent of Ac.4-29 cents situated in Pallivuru Village, Vajrapukottur Mandal, Srikakulam District pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders in WP No.10882/2018 dated.19.03.2018 and dismiss the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: When the matter was listed on 25.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and, consequently, the matter was directed to be listed after two (2) weeks under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’. On 13.03.2026, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, as a last chance, the matter was directed to be listed on 16.03.2026. On 16.03.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared through online and again requested time to implead the Gram Panchayat concerned as a formal party to this Writ Petition. 2. Even today, when the matter is listed, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.03.2026 DSH