DEVRAO SHIVANNA ITLOD AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
WP/14029/2026 · 2026-10-14
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20993 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20993 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 6wp14029.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 6 WRIT PETITION NO. 14029 OF 2026 Devrao Shivanna Itlod And Others ….Petitioners VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra Thr Secretary And Another …..Respondents Mr. P. V. Jadhavar, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for the Respondent -State CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, J. J.
DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2026 P. C.
1. A prayer in this Petition is against a show-cause notice dated 28-08-2026 issued to the Petitioners by the Caste Scrutiny Committee- Respondents No. 2 asking explanation as to why their caste validity certificates shall not be revoked by re- opening /re-inquiry in which the validity certificates were granted to the Petitioners as belonging to ‘Mannerwarlu’ Scheduled Tribe.
2. After 10-08-2026, the Committee is conferred with the power to review its own orders. 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:49941-DB
(2) 6wp14029.26
3. Learned Advocate for the Petitioners has heavily pressed the matter. He relied upon the order dated 05-10-2026 passed in Writ Petition No.12582/2026 along with other Petitions. In this order, Court had issued notices wherein similar challenge was raised.
4. It is pointed out that in those Petitions i.e. in Writ Petition Nos.13095/2026 & 13122/2026, the show cause notices were given after 10-08-2026 i.e. after the amendment was brought inforce.
5. This court notices that it was a common order passed in said Petitions and probably for that reason by mistake, the notice is also issued in the said Petitions. This court does not find that the order was passed by noticing the dates. Since the power is conferred with the Committee to review its own orders, it is open for the Petitioners to raise all the grounds before the Committee in the proceedings. We do not find any case, calling for interference in the Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] VishalK/6wp14029.26 2 of 2