Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20987 (AP)

CHILKURI SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15129/2022 · 2026-01-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010252822022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15129/2022 Between: 1. CHILKURI SATYANARAYANA, S/O CH.SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT YRS, R/O D.NO. 6-14, THUNGAPAHAD VILLAGE, MIRYALAGUDA MANDAL, NALGONDA DISTRICT. 2. CHILKURI NAGA RA, S/O CH.SOMARAJU, AGED ABOUT YRS, R/O D.NO. 6-14, DREENIVASA NAGAR, THUNGAPAHAD VILLAGE, MIRYALAGUDA MANDAL, NALGONDA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRATARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Y.S.R.KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCULAR INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA, ANDHARA PRADESH. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GALIVEEDU POLICE STATION, GALIVEEDU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA, ANDHARA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order .or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents 4 and 5 in harassing the Petitioners and their family members by Summoning the Petitioners to the Galiveedu Police Station and insisting for the settlement in Civil Case and threatening the Petitioners by blackmailing the petitioners to settle and already settled issue, and also direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to harass the Petitioners by Summoning the Petitioners to the Galiveedu Police Station and not to involve in civil cases with regarding to any civil dispute or settlement and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K ARUNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ or order .or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents 4 and 5 in harassing the Petitioners and their family members by Summoning the Petitioners to the Galiveedu Police Station and insisting for the settlement in Civil Case and threatening the Petitioners by blackmailing the petitioners to settle and already settled issue, and also direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to harass the Petitioners by Summoning the Petitioners to the Galiveedu Police Station and not to involve in civil cases with regarding to any civil dispute or settlement and pass ...= Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that after completion of investigation, Police filed charge sheet and that no further orders are necessary in this matter. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 15129 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*