[2026:RJ-JP:4280] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17036/2025 Prakash S/o Shri Sishpal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Todpura, P.s. Gothada, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present In J.c. At District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Majhar Hussain Ms. Soniya Saini Mr. Wasim Akram For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.174/2024 registered at Police Station Gothda, District Jhunjhunu for offences under Section 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 140(3), 307 of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that none of the injuries sustained by injured Sunil Kumar are on vital part of the body and not designated as dangerous to life. He stated that till now the trial court has not recorded the statement of any witnesses. Though fourteen cases have been reported as [2026:RJ-JP:4280] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17036/2025] criminal antecedents against the present petitioner but he is already on bail in all the cases. Charge-sheet has already been filed. Petitioner is behind the bars since 06.02.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. antecedent 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Prakash S/o Shri Sishpal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Gothda, District Jhunjhunu in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station [2026:RJ-JP:4280] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17036/2025] as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/112