IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 211 CRM-M-15347-2026 Date of decision : 27.05.2026 PARMINDER SINGH @ PINDER ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA ...... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : None for the petitioner. Ms. Deepali Verma, Asstt. A.G. Haryana. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. The learned State counsel, on the instructions of ASI Kuldeep Singh, has contended that despite notice, the petitioner has not joined the investigation. 2. A perusal of record shows that on last occasion also nobody had appeared on behalf of petitioner, and therefore, a direction was given to the registry to inform the counsel for the petitioner. As per report of registry intimation has been given to the counsel for the petitioner. However, despite that the petitioner is unrepresented today. 3. Thus, it is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. The same is hereby dismissed in default. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 27.05.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.05.27 20:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document