Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20976 (CHH)

MALESH KUMAR RAJPUT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2680/2026 · 2026-05-25

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23482 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2680 of 2026 1 - Malesh Kumar Rajput S/o Late Shri Goverdhan Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Rajmahal Chowk, Near Durga Mandir, Samnapur Road, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector, Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Municipal Officer Municipal Council, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar Kawardha District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh 6 - Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Kawardha, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Satyam Shivam, Advocate. For State : Shri Amit Buxy, Dy GA. For Respondent No.4 : Shri Bhupendra Singh, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 26/05/2026 1. This Writ Petition has been filed against the arbitrary action of the respondent authorities who without issuing any notice or drawing AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.05.26 16:54:32 +0530 2 any proceedings have proceeded to demolish the shops of the petitioner situated at Sheet No.10-B, Plot No.137, admeasuring 45 sq. mt. situated at Rajmahal chowk, Kawardha, District Kabirdham C.G. 2. Learned counsel for Municipal Council, Kawardha, on instructions, submits that only demarcation has been done in respect of the subject shop and after issuing notice and considering reply of the petitioner, they will take suitable action against the petitioner, in accordance with law. 3. In view of the statement made by counsel for Respondent No.4, nothing survives for adjudication in this case at this juncture. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 5. Consequently, I.A. No.3/2026, application for hearing during summer vacation and I.A. No.2/2026, application for urgent hearing also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Avinash