1 2026:CGHC:23469 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 630 of 2026 1. Harish Agrawal S/o Late Shyam Sunder Agrawal Aged About 57 Years Partner A.T.C. Rice Products, (1) Address A.T.C. Rice Products, Mohara Road Village Mohra Near Mohra Sub-Station District Rajnandgaon (Wrongly Mentioned As Rajnandgaon In Impugned Order) C.G. 491441 (2) Address Ramadhin Marg, Ward No. 25, Opposite Advocate Surjan House, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon C.G. 2. A.T.C. Rice Products (1) Address A.T.C. Rice Products, Mohara Road Village Mohra Near Mohra Sub-Station District Rajnandgaon (Wrongly Mentioned As Rajnandgaon In Impugned Order) C.G. 491441 3. Sangeeta Agrawal W/o Harish Agrawal Aged About 56 Years Partner A.T.C. Rice Products, (1) Address A.T.C. Rice Products, Mohara Road Village Mohra Near Mohra Sub-Station District Rajnandgaon (Wrongly Mentioned As Rajnandgaon In Impugned Order) C.G. 491441 (2) Address Ramadhin Marg, Ward No. 25, Opposite Advocate Surjan House, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon C.G. 4. Geeta Devi Agrawal W/o Late Shyam Sunder Agrawal Aged About 81 Years Partner A.T.C. Rice Products, (1) Address A.T.C. Rice Products, Mohara Road Village Mohra Near Mohra Sub-Station District Rajnandgaon (Wrongly Mentioned As Rajnandgaon In Impugned Order) C.G. 491441 (2) Address Ramadhin Marg, Ward No. 25, Opposite Advocate Surjan House, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Authum Investment And Infrastructure Ltd., C/o Authorized Person Mr. Karshan Soni, Office 246/6, 2nd Floor, Near Sant Gyaneshwar School, Vallabh Nagar Colony, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001 2. Tehsildar, Rajnandgaon Tehsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.05.26 16:55:46 +0530 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Jain, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 26.05.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the matter is pending before Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) at Jabalpur, but the DRT at Jabalpur is not functioning, as such, the matter has not been taken up for hearing and the same may cause irreparable loss to the petitioners. He would further submit that the matter is urgent, therefore, they may be allowed to prefer an appeal or an appropriate application before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) at Allahabad for redressing their grievance as dispossession notice has already been issued to them on 30.04.2026. 2. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners seems to be just and proper. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal along with copy of the order passed by this Court before the DRAT at Allahabad for hearing the matter. In the eventuality of filing of an appeal/application before DRAT at Allahabad, the said Tribunal shall hear and decide the matter expeditiously, in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. 5. Consequently, all the pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish