[2026:RJ-JP:16405] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 6002/2026 1. Imamuddin S/o Jakar, aged about 27 years, R/o Village Tata ka Vas, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, (Ra- jasthan). (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg). 2. Aasif S/o Aamin, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Janghawli, Police Station Shergarh, District Mathura (Ut- tar Pradesh). (At Present Confined in Sub Jail, Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aslam Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 18/04/2026 1. The present second bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.11/2026 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 61(2)(a), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338 & 340(2) of BNS and Section(s) 66-D of IT Act. 2. The first bail application of the accused-petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of the charge-sheet. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and [2026:RJ-JP:16405] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6002/2026] they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. He further submits that investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed and accused-petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioners have been in custody since 12.01.2026 and no custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required. He further submits conclusion of the trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners into custody, therefore, pray to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the said offences involve serious cyber fraud activity. He further submits that there is one complaint against petitioner- Imamuddin and three complaints against petitioner - Aasif on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Hence, benefit of bail should not be granted to the petitioners. 5. In response thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the complaints against the petitioners are false, moreover in the complaints against Imamuddin and Aasif, a meagre amount of Rs.70,100/- and Rs.48,499/-, respectively, is involved. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners, the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter, petitioners have been in custody since long and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this [2026:RJ-JP:16405] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6002/2026] Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Therefore, this second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and the accused-petitioners, namely (1) Imamuddin S/o Jakar and (2) Aasif S/o Aamin, are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioners are directed to mark their presence before the concerned Police Station in the 3rd week of every month till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioners' attendance report to the trial Court on the same day of each month. 8. In case of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioners for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J 4 - RAVI KHANDELWAL