Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20966 (CHH)

MAA JAGATARAN RICE MILL v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/2681/2026 · 2026-05-25

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23481 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2681 of 2026 1 - Maa Jagataran Rice Mill Registered Office At Village Masaura, Tehsil - Bharatpur, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh Through Its Proprietor Rishab Singh S/o Shri Prahlad Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Toja, Tehsil - Bharatpur, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation Limited Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector (Food Cell) Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 5 - General Manager C.G. State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Head Quarter Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited, Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 7 - District Food Officer Office Of Collector, District Manendragarh- Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 8 - State Bank Of India Through Its Branch Manager, Janakpur Branch, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.05.26 16:55:28 +0530 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Gyan Prakash Shukla, Advocate through VC. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Ramakant Mishra, DSGI. For Respondent Nos. 3 & 5, 6 & 8 Shri Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondent : Shri Rohitasva Singh, Dy GA. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 26/05/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition if subsequently any need arises. 2. Permission granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Consequently, I.A. No.3/2026, application for urgent hearing and I.A. No.4/2026, application for hearing the case during summer vacation also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Avinash