- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28845-DB WA No. 1539 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT APPEAL NO.1539 OF 2026 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: TEJRAJ GULECHA S/O PUKHRAJ GULECHA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O NO.1101, EKKA, 11TH FLOOR, PLATINUM ANANDA, CHAMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560018. …APPELLANT (BY SRI HEMENDRANATH REDDY, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI PRATIBHANU SINGH KHAROLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. EMBASSY EAST BUSINESS PARK LIMITED (FORMERLY CONCORD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED), A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT EMBASSY POST, NO.150, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. Digitally signed by C K LATHA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28845-DB WA No. 1539 of 2026 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, A STATUTORY BODY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.G. RAGHAVAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI AJESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT WRIT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND FINAL ORDER DATED 12.05.2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P. NO.9612/2026 AND ETC., THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28845-DB WA No. 1539 of 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The appellant has filed the present appeal seeking to impugn the order dated 12.05.2026 [impugned order] passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 9612/2026 (GM-KIADB). 2. After some arguments, the learned counsel for the parties submit that without making any observations, the impugned order be set aside and the Writ Petition be restored. Mr. Raghavan, the learned Senior Counsel for respondent No.1, submits that it be clarified that this order shall not be read as accepting that the appellant has any locus in the matter. 3. In view of the above, the impugned order is set aside. It is clarified that this order shall not be construed to mean that this Court has accepted that the appellant has any locus in the matter. We have not expressed any opinion on this question. All contentions of the parties are reserved. 4. List the matter before the concerned roaster Bench on 22.06.2026. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28845-DB WA No. 1539 of 2026 5. We also clarify that all interim orders subsisting in the Writ Petition as on 12.05.2026 stand revived. 6. The appeal and all pending interlocutory applications are disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE CKL/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 14