- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26407 WP No. 36595 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 36595 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, W/O RAJANNA @ B.L. NAGESH, R/AT NO.6, KOTHANUR VILLAGE, K.R. PURA HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VAISHNAVI G.K., ADVOCATE AND SRI. SHIVAKUMAR V.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B N RAMESH S/O SRI NANJAPPA, R/AT NO.146, KANAKALAKSHMI NILAYA, BYRATHI VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077. 2. B.N. NARAYANASWAMY, S/O SRI NANJAPPA, R/AT NO.156, NEAR ANJANEYA TEMPLE, BYRATHI VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077. 3. VINCENT SALINS, S/O B.A. ARUN KUMAR, R/AT NO.26, LAVELLE ROAD, Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26407 WP No. 36595 of 2025 BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. PRAKASH MICHAEL SALINS, S/O MR. VINCENT, R/AT ASHIRVAD, BAIRANJE POST, VIA PARKALA, UDUPI, AND ALSO AT NO.26, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 5. PRAKASH PALANI, S/O S. PALANI, R/AT NO.37/9, MEANEE AVENUE TANK ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042. 6. GOPI PALANI, S/O NANJAPPA, R/AT NO.37/9, MEANEE AVENUE TANK ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 042. 7. KESHAVAN C., S/O NANJAPPA, R/AT NO.156, BYRATHI VILLAGE, KOTHANUR POST, BENGALURU - 560 077. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, QUASH THE IMPUGNED PORTION OF THE ORDER DATED 17.07.2025 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1/2024 IN O.S.NO.6279/2016 BY THE XX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, INSOFAR AS IT REFUSES TO GRANT LIBERTY TO INSTITUTE A FRESH SUIT UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 1(3) CPC AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:26407 WP No. 36595 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER A memo is filed stating that the parties have entered into a settlement. In view of the settlement and the receipt of the entire settlement amount, the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition. Hence, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8