Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:23494
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2719 of 2026 1 - M/s Pawan Bricks Through Their Proprietor Shri Maniram Sahu S/o Shri Kheduram Sahu Village Chilpi, Tehsil- Dadhi District- Bemetara C.G. 491335 2 - Shri Maniram Sahu S/o Shri Kheduram Sahu Aged About 54 Years Village Chilpi, Tehsil Dadhi, District- Bemetara C.G.491335
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Bank Of India Through Their Authorized Officer At Investor Relations Cell Star House-I, 8th Floor,c-5, G-Block, Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051, And A Branch Office Of Bank Of India At Pikhari Talab Kawardha Road, Bemetara C.G.491335 2 - The Tehsildar Tehsil Dadhi, District- Bemetara C.G.491335 3 - The Mal Jamadaar Tehsil Dadhi District- Bemetara C.G.491335
... Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Rai, Advocate appearing through VC
2 For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Parth Shrivastava on behalf of Mr. Anand Shukla
Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 26/05/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they have already filed an application before Debt Recovery Tribunal Jabalpur on 09.05.2026 and thereafter they have filed this writ petition on the pretext that no Presiding Officer is available at the Debt Recovery Tribunal Jabalpur and no other DRT have an additional charge of the DRT Jabalpur. As such, the matter has not been taken up for hearing and the same may cause irreparable loss to the petitioners. he would further submit that the matter is urgent, therefore, he may be allowed to prefer an appeal or an appropriate application before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Allahabad for redressing their grievance.
2. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners seems to be just and proper.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to file an appeal along with copy of the order passed by this Court before the DRAT at Allahabad for hearing the matter. In the eventuality of filing of an appeal/application before DRAT at Allahabad, the said Tribunal shall hear and decide the matter expeditiously, in accordance with law.
3
4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present Writ Petition is disposed of.
5. Consequently, all the pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. SD/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
JUDGE Madhurima