APHC010255892019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11548/2019 Between: 1. KOLASANI SRINIVAS SECURITY AGENCY, REP., BY IS PROPRIETOR, COL. K. SRINIVAS (RETD.,) S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.3-28-18/112, FLAT NO.102, YAGANTI NIVAS, RAJENDRA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REP., BY ITS SPECIAL SECRETARY, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI. 2. DIRECTORATE GENERAL RESETTLEMENT, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REP., BY ITS JOINT DIRECTOR WEST BLOCK-4, R.K. PURAM, NEW DELHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings No. 2112/SA/UP/4138/AP/Emp/2019, dated 1.8.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent authority, as arbitrary, illegal, null and void against norms of public policy and principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and to set aside the same and consequently to direct the respondent authorities to continue the empanelment of the petitioner agency with the 2nd respondent authority for 2 sponsorship of providing security guards to the empanelled departments of the 2nd respondent authority and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the proceedings No. 2112/SA/UP/4138/AP/Emp/ 2019, dated 1.8.2019 issued by the 2nd respondent authority, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to continue the petitioners services for the security agencies awarded in favour of the petitioner till the age of 60 years in pursuance of the 1st respondent scheme dated 09-07-2012 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the proposed respondents 3 to 11 , as respondents 3 to 11 in the above W.P. No. 11548 of 2019 and in I.A. No. 1 of 2020 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Ms. S. Akhila, learned counsel, representing Sri Venkateswara Rao Gudapati, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS 4 143 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11548/2019 Dated: 06.01.2026 KAS