13.05.2026 Sl. No.28 NB CRM (A) 1308 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Murarai PS Case No.82/2026 dated 22.03.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/74/3(5) of BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Sarif Sk. @ Sekh Sharif & Ors. . … petitioners Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Mr. Santanu Deb Roy, Mr. Azizul Islam. …for the petitioners. Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, Mr. Somnath Adhikary. ………..Amicus Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. There was an altercation between two groups of villagers. Injuries were suffered on both sides. But, none was grievous in nature. The petitioners filed their FIR first. Learned Amicus assisting the State relies on the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the statement of the alleged victim and the statements of local eye-witnesses. He also refers to the injury reports of the victims. One of the injury report shows fracture of a finger of one of the victims. The other one shows a cut on the neck and injury on a vital part of the body like the head requiring stitches for repair. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail to the present petitioners. 2 The application for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)