Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20956 (KAR)

SRI K VASUDEVA v. BENGALURU CO OPERATIVE MILK UNION LIMITED

WP/6405/2025 · 2026-06-09

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27660 WP No. 6405 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 6405 OF 2025 (S-R) BETWEEN: SRI. K. VASUDEVA, S/O LATE N. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.112, 3RD MAIN, 4TH PHASE, K.G.EAST, BANASHANKARI, 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH N.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BENGALURU CO-OPERATIVE MILK UNION LIMITED, DR.M.H.MARIGOWDA ROAD, D.R.C. POST, BENGALURU – 560 029. REPRESENTED BY GENERAL MANAER (FIN), THE R1 IS SOCIETY Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27660 WP No. 6405 of 2025 REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ACT. 2. THE ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER, SUB-REGIONAL P.F. OFFICE, ANNPOORNESHWARI COMPLEX, SURVEY NO.37/1, 6TH MAIN, SINGA SANDRA, HOSUR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 068. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT.NANDITA D HALDIPUR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 14.08.23, WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNX-E AND FURTHER BE PLEASE TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY HIGHER PENSION TO THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27660 WP No. 6405 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER The petitioner filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation vide Annexure-E dated 14.08.2023, wherein the petitioner has prayed for higher pension. Respondent No.2 has not considered the representation and passed any order. Hence, this writ petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, if reasonable time is granted, respondent No.2 will consider the representation vide Annexure-E and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.2, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation vide Annexure-E and pass an appropriate - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27660 WP No. 6405 of 2025 order in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. 4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB