Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:HHC:35977 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 10861 of 2026 Decided on: 24.8.2026 M/s. Nav Durga Stone Crusher. ….Petitioner.
Versus State of H.P. & Anr. ….Respondents. Corum Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner. Ms. Tim Sharan Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Rishi Tandon, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.Harshita Dogra and Ms.Manisha Kumari, Advocates, for respondent No. 2.
Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Learned Additional Advocate General are in agreement that issue involved in this matter is similar to issue involved in CWP No. 15413 of 2024, titled as M/s Brajesh Stone Crusher Vs. State of H.P. & another which has been 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes
2 ( 2026:HHC:35977 ) decided by passing a detailed judgment on 11.8.2026 alongwith connected matters.
2. In view of above statements of parties, present petition is also disposed of in terms of judgment dated 11.8.2026 passed in CWP No. 15413 of 2024, titled as M/s Brajesh Stone Crusher Vs. State of H.P. & Another alongwith connected matters, with observation that findings returned therein shall be mutatis mutandis applicable to the present matter also and parties shall be governed and abide by judgment passed and directions issued in the said judgment. The petition is disposed of alongwith pending applications in aforesaid terms. (Vivek Singh Thakur),
Judge. (Ranjan Sharma), Judge. 24th August, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez)