APHC010249432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11100/2018 Between: 1. B.MALLIKANTHAMMA,, W/O. B.REDDY SEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.MARRIMAKULAPALLI VILLAGE, GANDRAJU PALLI POST, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLI. CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Notice in Roc.B/620/2018, dated 24-03-2018 issued by the respondent No.4 under Section 7 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 calling upon the petitioner to submit her explanation as to why the petitioner shall not be evicted from the land in an extant of Ac.3.50 Cents in Sy.No.319/2 of Marrimakulapalli Village, 2 JS, J W.P.No. 11100/2018 Gandrajupalli Post, Gangavaram andal, Chittoor District assigned to the petitioner through D.Form No.160/95 as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the well established legal principles, apart from being violative of fundamental and Constitutional Rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Notice in Roc.B/620/2018, dated 24-08-2018 issued by the respondent No.4, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No. 11100/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. In view of the decision in subsequent writ petition No.13558 of 2018, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 20.02.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No. 11100/2018 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11100/2018 Date: 20.02.2026 rsd