NAND LAL v. H.P. State Forest Development Corporation
EX.P./1528/2026 · 2026-08-27
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20953 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20953 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Pet No.1528 of 2026
Decided on: 27.08.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Nand Lal
....Petitioner
Versus H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Kuldeep Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner seeks enforcement of Nand Lal Vs. H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and Anr2 as under:-
“4. In view of above, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the cases of the petitioner(s) for grant of notional annual increment from the date of conferment of work charge status, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above
judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 CWP No. 16 of 2026, decided alongwith connected matter on 05.01.2026
- 2 -
order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.”
2.
Learned vice counsel for the respondents- Corporation has placed on record office order dated 05.05.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid office order is not in conformity with the settled legal positon. The benefits due to be paid to the petitioner have been wrongly and unjustly denied to him. If that is so, it is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for assailing the order passed by the respondents.
4.
With the above observations, present execution petition to stand disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge August 27, 2026 R.Atal