Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20953 (HP)

NAND LAL v. H.P. State Forest Development Corporation

EX.P./1528/2026 · 2026-08-27

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pet No.1528 of 2026 Decided on: 27.08.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Nand Lal ....Petitioner Versus H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr.Kuldeep Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks enforcement of Nand Lal Vs. H.P. State Forest Development Corporation and Anr2 as under:- “4. In view of above, these petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the cases of the petitioner(s) for grant of notional annual increment from the date of conferment of work charge status, in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment, within a period of six weeks from today. The 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes 2 CWP No. 16 of 2026, decided alongwith connected matter on 05.01.2026 - 2 - order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.” 2. Learned vice counsel for the respondents- Corporation has placed on record office order dated 05.05.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid office order is not in conformity with the settled legal positon. The benefits due to be paid to the petitioner have been wrongly and unjustly denied to him. If that is so, it is for the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for assailing the order passed by the respondents. 4. With the above observations, present execution petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 27, 2026 R.Atal