[2026:RJ-JP:793] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16832/2025 1. Mahendra S/o Prakash, R/o Nale Ka Pass, Jatav Basti, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 2. Vicky S/o Pushpendra, R/o Khare Kua Ke Pass, Jatav Basti, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 3. Rajjo @ Rajababu S/o Jagmohan, R/o Khare Kua Ke Pass, Jatav Basti, Hindaun City, District Karauli. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Beniwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP assisted b Mr. Anirudh Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/01/2026 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.218/2025 registered at Police Station Hindaun, District Karauli for the offences under Section 112(2) of BNS and Section 13 of RPGO Act, the accused-petitioners have preferred the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners were involved in act of gambling and against them, several cases under Section 13 of RPGO Act were registered. Prima-facie offence under Section 112(2) of BNS is not made out against any of the petitioners as [2026:RJ-JP:793] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16832/2025] the prosecution has failed to show that the petitioners were member of any organized gang and have continuously committed crime being a member of organized gang. The cases against the petitioners registered under Section 13 of RPGO Act are filed in their individual capacity and not as a gang member, the petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required, therefore, anticipatory bail application of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely: 1. Mahendra S/o Prakash, 2. Vicky S/o Pushpendr and Rajjo @ Rajababu S/o Jagmohan, in connection with FIR No.218/2025 registered at Police Station Hindaun, District Karauli, they shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves [2026:RJ-JP:793] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16832/2025] available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/297