THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH v. VEMULA SATISH KUMAR ALIAS SATTI
CRLP/3839/2024 · 2026-02-18
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20949 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20949 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010244352024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3839/2024 Between:
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, A.S. NAGAR POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AMARAVATI.
...PETITIONER AND
1. VEMULA SATISH KUMAR ALIAS SATTI, S/o. Durga Rao, aged 19 years R/o. Plot No.50, Vaddera Colony, Singh Nagar, Vijayawada.
...RESPONDENT/ ACCUSED Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to Cancel the Bail granted to the Respondent/Accused No.1 in CrI.M.P.No.283 of 2024 dated 28.05.2024 on the file of V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 28.05.2024 passed in CrI.M.P. No. 283 of 2024 on the file of Hon’ble V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, pending main Criminal Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
2
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. GOTTUMUKKALA AMULYA SPENCER
2. LEGAL AID
3
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3839/2024
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Section 483(3) of the BNSS, has been filed by the Petitioner herein/Complainant, seeking to cancel the Bail granted to the Respondent/Accused No.1 in CrI.M.P.No.283 of 2024 dated 28.05.2024 on the file of V Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada in Cr.No.197 of 2024 of Ajitsingh Nagar Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 107(2) and 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Heard Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State and Ms. Gottumukkala Amulya Spencer, learned Legal Aid counsel appearing for the Respondent /Accused No. 1.
3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the present petition is filed seeking cancellation of the bail granted to the Respondent/Accused. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on instructions would submit that the Respondent/Accused has been complying with the conditions imposed while granting bail in this matter and he is cooperating with the investigation. She would further submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders.
4.
Learned counsel for the Respondent/Accused would submit that it is not the case that the Respondent/Accused has disobeyed the conditions imposed by the Court while releasing him on bail. There is no allegation against the
4
Respondent/Accused that he tampered with the evidence or interfered in the investigation. Learned counsel for the Respondent/Accused finally prays for dismissal of the petition.
5. Considering the submissions made and a fair look at the material placed on record, the Respondent/Accused No.1 herein is facing allegations for the offence punishable under Sections 120(B), 107(2) and 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in Cr.No.197 of 2024 of Ajitsingh Nagar Police Station. While so, he has moved an application before the District Court for regular bail, the learned Judged has considered the request of the Petitioner and allowed the application vide Order dated 28.05.2024 by imposing certain conditions. However, nothing has been placed before this Court regarding the non compliance of any conditions of bail or that he tampered with the evidence or interfered in the investigation. In absence of any violation of the conditions imposed, there are no grounds for cancellation of the bail granted to the Respondent/Accused. Therefore, this petition is liable to be dismissed.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.02.2026. UPS
5
195
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3839/2024
Dt.19.02.2026
UPS