1 APHC010248662019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2340/2019 Between: 1. POTHINA PRASAD, S/O SATYANARAYANA MURTHY ALIAS THAYI, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D.NO.1-52, CAR SHED JUNCTION, OLD POTHINA MALLAYAPALEM, NEAR MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHIPULLA VARALAKSHMI, W/o Apparao aged about 68 years, resident of D.No.428-6-6, Tinorpeta, Beside TMH School Lane, Chitti Nagar, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated No.11-06-2019 in I.A.No.371 of 2019 in O.S.No.194/2012 on the of the court of XII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatam, Visakhapatnam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.194/2012 on the file of XII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B PRAYAGA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2340 of 2019 ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 11.06.2019 in I.A.No.371 of 2019 in O.S.No.194 of 2012 on the file of learned XII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam by the revision petitioner, who is the 7th defendant in the main suit. 2. It is apt to note that the respondent herein, who is the plaintiff instituted O.S.No.194 of 2012 on the file of learned XII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam seeking partition and separate possession, declaration her title, cancelation of registered documents and to pass final decree in terms of preliminary decree and for costs of the suit. 3. In the said suit, one of the defendant namely Pothina Prasad/7th defendant filed I.A.No.371 of 2019 in O.S.No.194 of 2012 under Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C. seeking the rejection of the plaint. The said I.A. was dismissed by the Trial Court vide Order dated 11.06.2019. Challenging the said dismissal of Order VII Rule 11 of C.P.C petition, the instant Civil Revision Petition came to be filed before this Court. 4. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 5. The Registry of this Court forwarded the case details and downloaded it from the official website, which reveals that main suit 4 O.S.No.194 of 2012 on the file of learned XII Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam was dismissed with costs on 24.09.2025 itself. 6. As there is no representation for the petitioner and also keeping in view of case status information furnished by the Registry that the very main suit itself was dismissed. In the considered opinion of this Court, the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive. 7. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 13.03.2026 RMR/SSA