AJIT SINGH SARDAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REGISTRATION LAND REFORMS
WPC/5723/2025 · 2026-07-20
Sri Ananda Sen
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20941 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20941 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:21424 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5723 of 2025 ------ Ajit Singh Sardar, son of Rameshwar Singh Sardar, resident of Village Purisli, Panchayat Tamulia, P.O. Kapali, P.S. Chandil, District Seraikela, Kharswan, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus
1. State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand.
2. Deputy Commissioner, Seraikela-Kharsawan, having its office at Collectorate Building, Seraikella-Kharsawan, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, District Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
3. Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Seraikela-Kharsawan, having its office at Collectorate Building, Seraikella-Kharsawan, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, District Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
4. Circle Officer, Chandil, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, District Seraikella- Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
5. Moina Devi, wife of Late Sarveshwar Sardar, resident of Burudih, P.O. & P.S. Kandra, Seraikela Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
6. Binita Devi, wife of Sri Tonu Singh, resident of Kamargora, Kapali, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, District Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand.
7. Shankar Devi Singh, wife of Dashrath Singh, resident of H. No.43, Kukru, Patamda, Gobarghusi, P.O. & P.S. Patamda, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
8. Manju Singh, wife of Sushan Singh, resident of Betakocha, P.O. & P.S. Bhilaipahari, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
9. Punoti Devi, wife of Doka Singh, resident of Kadamjhor, P.O. Chilgu, P.S. Chandil, District Seraikela-Kharaswan, Jharkhand.
10. M/s Premier Infracom, through its Partner Navin Kumar Poddar, son of Nathu Lal Poddar, having its office at 1/1 Awas Crystal Road No.1, Contractors Area Bistupur, Jamshedpur, P.O & P.S. Bistupur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ------
CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amritansh Vats, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to GA-V
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate ------
06/ 20.07.2026
By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
2026:JHHC:21424 2
"i. For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) including the writ of certiorari for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.04.2023 as passed in T.A. Misc. Case No.239 of 2022-23 (Annexure-4) by the Learned Court of Deputy Commissioner, Seraikella Kharaswan, whereby, permission for sale of Land in Mouza- Purisli under section 49 of CNT Act was granted and the respondent no.10 was directed to pay the amount and fulfill its social obligations as the order is in teeth with the principles of natural justice and contravenes to the order passed by Hon’ble Jharkhand High Court in W.P.(C) No.2704 of 2023. ii. During the pendency of the writ petition, the impugned order dated 17.04.2023 passed in T.A. Misc. Case No.239/2022-23 be kept in abeyance/stayed or status quo shall be maintained over the said land.”
2.
Heard learned counsel representing the petitioner and
learned counsel representing the respondents.
3.
From the aforesaid prayer, it is clear that by the impugned order, an application under Section 49 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy (CNT) Act, had been allowed, in favour of respondent No.10, which effects the petitioner.
4.
Admittedly, there is a provision of Appeal under Section 215 (5) of the CNT Act. Since the impugned order is appealable and there is an Appellate Authority available, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition.
5.
The petitioner is directed to approach the Appellate Authority by filing an Appeal, within four weeks from today.
6.
Once the Appeal is filed along with the application for
2026:JHHC:21424 3
condonation of delay, the same will be considered sympathetically taking into account that this writ petition was pending before this Court.
7.
It is expected that the Appellate Authority will dispose the Appeal, by passing a reasoned order, after hearing all the parties concerned.
8.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.
(ANANDA SEN, J.)
20th July, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2
Uploaded on 22.07.2026