Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20940 (RAJ)

NARENDRA KUMAR @ TAR S/O AJIT SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16891/2025 · 2026-01-13

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1455] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16891/2025 Narendra Kumar @ Tar S/o Ajit Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gunsar, Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Kishangarhbas (Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP Mr. Anirudh Singh Mr. Mukesh Goyal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 13/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 268/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim District Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 109(1) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 01.11.2025 and the trial of the case may take considerable time. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner and complainant have arrived at amicable settlement and complainant has submitted the written compromise before the trial court. It is also [2026:RJ-JP:1455] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16891/2025] contended that injury sustained to the injured Manjeet was at his leg and there was no murderous intention of the petitioner to cause death of the injured Manjeet, prima facie offence under Section 109 of BNS is not made out, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Learned counsel for the complainant concedes that petitioner and the complainant/injured have arrived at amicable settlement and executed a compromise and contended that if the bail application of the petitioner is allowed then the complainant/injured have not objection. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and more particularly after going through the nature of injuries caused to injured, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Narendra Kumar @ Tar S/o Ajit Singh, in connection with FIR No. 268/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim District Khairthal- Tijara shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The concerned trial Judge [2026:RJ-JP:1455] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16891/2025] shall verify the address and contact details of the sureties through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station shall send the presence report of the accused petitioner on the same day to the trial court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within seven days of release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned trial court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /90