THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS v. SHRI HANAN KATH @ HANON KATH AND ANR
I.A.(Civil)/47/2026 · 2026-04-01
Susmita Phukan Khaund
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2094 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2094 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020001852026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/47/2026 THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THEN CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF NAGALAND, NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY P AND AR DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 3: THE SECRETARY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT (PHED) NAGALAND KOHIMA 4: THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIM VERSUS SHRI HANAN KATH @ HANON KATH AND ANR RTD. W/C KHALASI, KHM-0873, OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PHED, KOHIMA RURAL DIVISION, KOHIMA , NAGALAND 2:SHRI YASHIKA RENGMA @ YASUKHA RENGMA RETIRED W/C CONTROL MAN KMA - 0891 OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PHED KOHIMA RURAL DIVISION KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : GOVT ADV NL,
Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
ORDER 02.04.2026
1. Heard learned counsel Mr. S. Walling for the applicants.
2. Learned Government Advocate, Mr. E. Thiba Phom has submitted that vide judgment and order of this Court in connection with WP(C) No. 122/2025 on 27.08.2025, this Court has directed the Government to consider the case of the petitioners in terms of the Office Memorandum dated 17.03.2015 at the earliest within 6 (six) months. The petitioners/applicants have prayed for extension of time as 6 (six) month’s time has already expired.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners/respondents case is under
consideration and 6 (six) months may be allowed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners/respondents has raised objection stating that the applicants already had sufficient time and another period of 6 (six) months will prejudice the petitioners/respondents in this case.
5. I have considered the submission that the petitioners case is under consideration. Thereby, time is extended for another 6(six) months to consider the petitioners case and no further time will be allowed.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE Comparing Assistant