Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20933 (KAR)

SRI. SHANKAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/94/2020 · 2026-06-10

Ravi V Hosmani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28057 WP No. 94 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 94 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHANKAR S/O B.R. RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. (548) 3137, 1ST CROSS, VBHS LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560085. 2. SMT. PRIYADARSHINI SHANKAR W/O SHANKAR AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/AT NO. (584) 3137, 1ST CROSS, VBHS LAYOUT, 3RD BLOCK, BANASHANKARI III STAGE, BENGALURU-560 085. …PETITIONERS [BY SRI. GOVINDARAJ K., ADVOCATE (AB)] AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HALASURU GATE POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU - 560 002. REP BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICE (GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) 2. SRI KALARAM PUROHIT S/O SAVALARAMJI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, Digitally signed by ANUSHA V Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28057 WP No. 94 of 2020 PARTNER OF M/S SUN IMPEX AND M/S SUNRISE INFO SERVICES, REG. OFFICE AT. NO. 10, 3RD FLOOR, SUDARSHAN MANSION, SUNKALPET MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SOUMYA R., HCGP FOR R1; SRI ARVIND KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR DATED 01.03.2019 IN CR.NO.39/2019 OF HALASURU GATE POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY AS PER ANNEXURES-F AND G, INVESTIGATION PURSUANT THERETO AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL CMM COURT, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU AS PER ANNEXURE-Q. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28057 WP No. 94 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioners absent. 2. This would indicate that petitioners are not pursuing petition diligently. Hence, petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE YKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0