Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2093 (KAR)

SRI DEEPAK v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/39617/2025 · 2026-02-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9566 WP No. 39617 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.39617 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. DEEPAK S/O JAYARAM SHETTY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 2. SMT. RATHNA AS PER AADHAR CARD RATHNA SHETTY, W/O JAYARAM SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS 3. SMT. DIVYA W/O SANTHOSH KUMAR SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NO.6-25, SEETHA NILAYA, KANCHARAM KAMBALE HOUSE, MARNE, AJEKAR, KARKALA, UDUPI-574101. …PETITIONERS (BY MISS. NAMITA HAVERI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY SOUTH EAST WOMEN POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU -560001. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9566 WP No. 39617 of 2025 2. SMT. GEETHA V., W/O. MR. DEEPAK, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO. 37, 2ND CROSS, 3RD MAIN, VIJAYA BANK LAYOUT, AREKERE, BENGALURU-560 076. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CODE OF CR.P.C./ UNDER SECTION 528 OF BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA - 2023 PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.90/2025 DATED 26.10.2025 (ANNEXURE- A) REGISTERED BY THE SOUTH EAST WOMEN POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 READ WITH SECTION 3(5) OF THE BHARATIYA NVAYA SANHITA, 2023, AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ARISING THEREFROM, INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9566 WP No. 39617 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners filed a Memo today seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition. The Memo so filed reads as follows: "The undersigned Petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the above petition at this stage and desires to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of aforesaid Memo, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Consequently, pending I.A. does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 180