[2026:RJ-JP:5207] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20372/2025 Narpat Singh S/o Shri Sajjan Singh, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Mukam Post Bansa, Via Maulasar, Tehsil Deedwana, District Nagaur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office Parivahan Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Deedwana Depot, District Nagaur. 3. Zonal Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Ajmer Zone, District Ajmer. 4. Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office Parivahan Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Ghiya Mr. Ankul Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by levelling charges of embezzlement, one charge-sheet dated 13.10.2008 was issued by the respondents, pursuant to which the penalty of dismissal from service was inflicted upon the petitioner on 28.10.2013. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that on the same set of facts and charges, the petitioner was also [2026:RJ-JP:5207] (2 of 2) [CW-20372/2025] subjected to a criminal trial in a Competent Criminal Court and after examining the entire evidence, has been acquitted vide judgment dated 11.08.2025. He also submits that acquittal in criminal case on the same set of facts and charges would amount to absolving him from any kind of liability attached to the allegations levelled against him. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that under these circumstances, petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation for reconsidering the penalty of dismissal in the light of subsequent fact, more particularly acquittal of the petitioner from criminal charges vide judgment dated 11.08.2025. 4. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before the Competent Authority, who shall take into consideration all the facts and circumstances, and shall pass a speaking order within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that no opinion on merits of the case has been expressed by this Court. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/41