Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20928 (PNJ)

GURJEET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/18401/2026 · 2026-05-29

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

185. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Gurjeet Singh State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: NAMIT KUMAR 1. Constitution of India, the suspension order dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits. 2. Court is not inclined to interfere for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. 3. 29.05.2026 sanjeev IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurjeet Singh Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Sarabpreet Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Surya Kumar, AAG, Punjab. ----- NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature the suspension order dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits. After arguing the case for some time and realising that this Court is not inclined to interfere with the suspens for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18401-2026 Date of decision: 29.05.2026 .... Petitioner .... Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Mr. Sarabpreet Singh Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner. G, Punjab. The instant petition has been filed under Article 226 of the in the nature of certiorari for quashing the suspension order dated 23.05.2026 (Annexure P-1), and for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits. After arguing the case for some time and realising that this the suspension order, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present petition. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No under Article 226 of the certiorari for quashing ce of a writ in the nature of mandamus for directing the respondents to reinstate After arguing the case for some time and realising that this ion order, learned counsel SANJEEV KUMAR 2026.05.29 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document