1 2026:HHC:36562 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1096 of 2026 Date of Decision: 27.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Raman Kumar ....Petitioners Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 17.08.2026 alongwith copy of office order dated 12.08.2026, wherein it has been stated that in compliance to the order/judgment dated 10.12.2025, passed in CWP No.19444 of 2025, the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent-Department, vide office order dated 12.08.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:36562 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail office order dated 12.08.2026, in accordance with law, if he is aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 27, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)