15.IAL-33681.26 & ORS.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 33681 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 114 OF 2026 Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.… Applicant (Defendant No.1) In the matter between Sun Pharma Industries Ltd. & Anr. ...Plaintiffs V/s. Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 28961 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 114 OF 2026 Unispeed Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant (Defendant No.7) In the matter between Sun Pharma Industries Ltd. & Anr. ...Plaintiffs V/s. Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.16 11:43:37 +0530 15.IAL-33681.26 & ORS.DOC WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 29762 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 114 OF 2026 MMG Healthcare … Applicant (Defendant No.10) In the matter between Sun Pharma Industries Ltd. & Anr. ...Plaintiffs V/s. Fibovil Pharmaceutical Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Defendants ______________________ Mr. Rahul R. Dubey a/w Ms. Shradha Patil, Ms. Ayesha i/by Atmaram Patade for the Applicants and for Defendant Nos.1, 7 and 10. Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w Mr. Nishad Nandkarni, Mr. Aasif Navodia, Ms. Khushboo Jhunjhunwala, Ms. Maitri Asher, Ms. Rohan Lopez, Ms. Rakshita Singh and Ms. Nihala Naiyyira i/by Khaitan & Co., for the Plaintiff. Mr. Sahil D. Salvi for Defendant Nos.2 & 9. Mr. Vikas Mishra for Defendant No.4. Mr. Deepak Bhalerao, 2nd Asstt. to Court Receiver present. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 15 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. These Interim Applications have been filed respectively by Defendant Nos.1, Defendant No.7 and Defendant No.10 seeking Page 2 PPN 15.IAL-33681.26 & ORS.DOC condonation of delay in filing the written statement. 2. As far as Defendant No.1 is concerned, there is delay of 103 days in filing the written statement, as far as Defendant No.7 is concerned, there is delay of 31 days in filing the written statement and as far as Defendant No.10 is concerned, there is delay of 31 days in filing the written statement. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff strongly opposes the said Interim Applications. 4. However, adequate reasons are set out in the respective Interim Applications seeking condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay in filing the written statements by Defendant No.1, Defendant No.7 and Defendant No.10 is condoned for the reasons set out in the said Interim Applications. The written statements respectively filed by the Defendant Nos.1, 7 and 10 are directed to be taken on record. 5. All the three Interim Applications are accordingly disposed of in above terms. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 3 PPN