Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20925 (BOM)

SHRUNALI SANJEEV MAHALE (Petitioner) v. Vasant Govind Patil (Decesead)

JOT/202/2026 · 2026-10-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

KVM 1/2 17 - JOT 202 OF 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION JUDGES ORDER NO. 202/2026 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 2813/2023 SHRUNALI SANJEEV MAHALE & ORS. ….. PETITIONERS VASANT GOVIND PATIL ….. DECEASED Adv. Ashish T. Suryavanshi for the Petitioners. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATE : 16 OCTOBER, 2026 P.C. :- 1) By the present Judges Order, the applicant is seeking permission to sell the immoveable property in terms of the draft agreement of sale, which has been annexed to the Judges Order. 2) A Letter of Administration dated 23 February, 2024 was issued to the petitioner. The petitioners claim herein are the three daughters and the only legal heirs of the deceased. They are seeking a permission to sell the immoveable property being Flat No. 405, 4th Floor, Mangal Murti Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Plot No. 311, CTS NO. 426, 421/1-7, Opposite Village Goregaon, Jawahar Nagar, Road No.12, Goregaon (West), Mumbai – 400 062. It is the KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2026.10.17 11:39:23 +0530 KVM 2/2 17 - JOT 202 OF 2026 case of the petitioners that the transaction is in the best interest of the estate and would not cause any prejudice to any person interested in the estate. He further stated that after the sale is completed, a compliance report will be filed within four weeks with the office of the Prothonotary and Senior Master, High Court, Bombay. 3) I have heard learned counsel for the applicant and I have gone through the contents of the affidavit in support of the Judges Order. 4) I am satisfied that the case is made out to allow this Judges Order. 5) The Judges Order is hereby permitted and signed separately. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]