920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO. 11373 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 11534 OF 2025 WITH COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.275 OF 2025 WITH LEAVE PETITION (L) NO.11642 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO. 11373 OF 2025 Hindustan Unilever Limited … Plaintiff V/s. AS Print-Pack Global Private Limited & Anr. ...Defendants ______________________ Mr. Anil Shete a/w Ms. Niyati Davawala, Ms. Stuti Thakar, Ms. Nidhi Rao and Ms. Chandrika Devda i/by Davawala & Co. for the Plaintiff. Mr. Ritvik Joshi for Defendant No.2. Plaintiff’s representative (through VC) present. Mr. Deepak Bhalerao, 2nd Asstt. to Court Receiver present. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 15 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- Leave Petition (L) NO.11642 OF 2025 1. Perused the averments in the Plaint and Leave Petition. Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.16 11:43:37 +0530 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC 2. For the reasons set out in Leave Petition, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Commercial IP Suit (L) No. 11373 OF 2025 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and Defendant state that Plaintiff and Defendants have settled the dispute and tendered the consent terms. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff states that the Plaintiff has already settled the dispute with Defendant No.1 and the Suit has already been decreed against Defendant No.1. 5. Now the consent terms have been arrived at between the Plaintiff and Defendant No.2. The consent terms are signed by Mr. Habibur Rehman Khan who has been authorised to sign the consent terms on behalf of the Plaintiff- Hindustan Unilever Limited and the document evidencing authorisation are annexed at Annexure 1 of the Consent Terms. The consent terms are also signed by Defendant No.2- Mr.Sachin Goel. Both Mr. Habibur Rehman Khan and Mr. Sachin Goel appears through Video Conferencing and state that the Plaintiff and Defendant No.2 have settled the dispute in terms of the consent terms and both of them Page 2 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC have signed the consent terms. The consent terms are also signed by respective advocates and the respective advocates identified the signature of respective parties. 6. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. A scanned copy of the Consent Terms is reproduced herein below: Page 3 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC Page 4 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC Page 5 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC Page 6 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC Page 7 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC Page 8 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC 7. Various statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. 8. The suit is earlier decreed against Defendant No.1 and now it is settled between the Plaintiff and Defendant No. 2 in terms of the consent terms. Page 9 PPN 920.COMIPL-11373.25.DOC 9. Accordingly, Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit (L) No. 11373 of 2026 is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms. 10. Refund of Court fees as per rules. 11. As the Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit is disposed of, the Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts, subject to payment of costs, charges and expenses to be paid by the Plaintiff within two weeks from the demand being made by the office of the Court Receiver. 12. As the Court Receiver stands discharged, Court Receiver Report No.275 of 2025 stands disposed of, subject to payment of cost of Rs.5000/-. 13. In view of disposal of Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit (L) No.11373 of 2025, nothing survives in Interim Application (L) No. 11534 of 2025 and the same is also disposed of in terms of consent terms. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 10 PPN