Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27986 W.P. No.6207/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.6207/2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. GANGADHARAPPA S/O NANJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS.
2.
SRI. MANJUNATH S/O GANGADHARAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
BOTH RESIDING AT: HUSKUR VILLAGE DODDABALAVANGALA HOBLI DODDABALLAPUR TALUK-561203. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. NAGARATHNA S.K. ADV.,)
AND:
1.
SMT. HANUMAKKA W/O NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 88 YEARS.
2.
SRI. KRISHNAPPA S/O NARASAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT : HUSKUR DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI DODDABALLAPUR TALUK-561203. …RESPONDENTS (R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27986 W.P. No.6207/2021
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DODDABALLAPUR ON I.A. I UNDER SEC.10 OF CPC DATED 07.11.2020 IN O.S.200/2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE SAID APPLICATION & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
This writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 07.11.2020 passed on I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.200/2011 by the Senior Civil Judge, Doddaballapur, (for short, ‘the trial Court’).
2. Smt.Nagarathna S.K., learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners-plaintiffs have filed an application under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking stay of the suit in O.S.No.200/2011 on the ground that the subject matter in the suit as well as in RSA No.1161/2009 is substantially one and the same. It is submitted that RSA No.1161/2009 was disposed of on 18.12.2024 by setting aside the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27986 W.P. No.6207/2021
judgment and decree in R.A.No.115/2007 and the matter is remitted back to the First Appellate Court.
3. In view of the aforesaid judgment, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the present petition. Hence, the petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25