Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20914 (DEL)

RAJIV GANDHI AYURVED MAHAVIDYALAYA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

W.P.(C)/14329/2026 · 2026-09-28

Jasmeet Singh

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~126 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010466892026 + W.P.(C) 14329/2026 RAJIV GANDHI AYURVED MAHAVIDYALAYA .....Petitioner Through: Mr Animesh Kumar, Mr Nishant Kumar, Dr Sumit Kumar, Ms Aprajita, Mr Yashwardhan Singh, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kumar Prashant and Mr. Devesh Gupta, Advocates for R2-3 Ms. Puja S. Kalra, CGSC with Mr. Rahul Bhaskar, GP for R1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 28.09.2026 CM APPL. 67197/2026 & CM APPL. 67196/2026 Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exeptions. Applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) 14329/2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- “a) Issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 08.07.2026 issued by the Respondent No 3. AND b) Issue an appropriate writ/order/direction in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 25.08.2026 issued by This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:17:43 the Respondent No 2. AND c) Issue appropriate writ/order/direction in nature of Mandamus directing the Respondents to grant permission to admit students with 50 Seats for AY 2026-27. AND/OR d) Pass any other or further order(s) or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, equity, and fair play.....” 2. Ms. Kalra, learned CGSC, and Mr. Gupta, learned counsel, accept notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2-3 respectively. 3. Mr. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that his grievance will be satisfied if a direction is issued to decide the 2nd appeal of the petitioner expeditiously and within 10 days from today. 4. In view of the said request, the petition is disposed of directing the respondent No.1 to decide the 2nd appeal of the petitioner within 10 days. 5. The appellate authority shall also consider the aspect of fresh inspection of the petitioner institute. 6. The Court has not examined the merits/demerits of the controversy raised in the petition. Needless to add, the petitioner shall also be at liberty to avail of its remedies in accordance with law against the Order. JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:17:43