Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20913 (BOM)

RAJU PUNARAM MIRZA v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/4285/2025 · 2026-10-15

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1/2 911 IA 4285-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4285 OF 2025 IN APPEAL ST NO. 23331 of 2025 Raju Punaram Mirza .. Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra .. Respondent … Mr. Pawan Mali for the applicant. Mr.Tanveer Khan, APP for the State. CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE & ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ DATED : 15th OCTOBER, 2026 P.C:- IA No. 4285/2025 1 The Application seek condonation of delay of 193 days in filing the Appeal being aggrieved by the judgment dated 26/3/2005 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Pune, convicting the applicant under Section 302 of the IPC. 2 Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the application. Being satisfied with the bonafides for the reasons stated therein and since according to us, the reasons stated shows sufficiency for the delay, application is made absolute in terms of its prayer clause by condoning the delay. Tilak MANALI PRASANNA TILAK Digitally signed by MANALI PRASANNA TILAK Date: 2026.10.19 14:51:36 +0530 2/2 911 IA 4285-25.doc APPEAL ST NO. 23331/2025 Admit. Mr. Khan waives notice on behalf of the State. Call for R & P. The R & P shall be furnished with utmost expedition, as the counsel representing the appellant is desirous of moving an application for suspension of sentence, being appointed through Legal Aid, he does not have access to any documents. Registry shall ensure that the R & P is received at the earliest. (ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Tilak