[2026:RJ-JP:16522-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 167/2026 Dr. Brijmohan Sapoot Kala Sanskriti Sewa Sansthan, A Society Registered Under The Provisions Of Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958 And Having Its Office At 1, Dwarika Colony, Pansal Road, Bhilwara Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Devendra Singh Son Of Shri Kalyan Singh Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 6, Loharwada, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) - 303807 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary, Department Of Mines And Petroleum, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Director, Directorate Of Mines And Geology, Khanij Bhawan, Shastri Circle, Udaipur 4. Hg Infra Toll Way Private Limited, Having Its Office At 14, Panchwati Colony, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Rajasthan)-302011 Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Suraj Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o B-562, Murlipura Scheme, Vkia, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, AG & Sr. Adv. through VC assisted by Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma Mr. Tanay Goyal Ms. Dhriti Laddha Ms. Alankrita Sharma with Mr. Aniket Vyas HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU (Through VC) Order 18/04/2026 1. This is an application seeking restoration of the order dated 16.03.2026, passed by this Court, whereby, the review petition was dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:16522-DB] (2 of 2) [WRES-167/2026] 2. The petitioner submits that he had not given any consent to withdraw this case, whereas, the lawyer is authorized in terms of the vakalatnama to take a decision as to whether petition is required to be withdrawn or not. Moreover, in the present case, the petitioner had prayed for withdrawal, which was stated by the counsel upon instructions. 3. This Court would not allow a litigant to misuse the process of Court by changing his stand one after another. Principle of approbate and reprobate does not allow such application. 4. Accordingly, the application for restoration/recall is dismissed. 5. All the pending applications also stand disposed of. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ poojadubey/39