Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20907 (AP)

PATTAMSETTI SRINIVASU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/12191/2024 · 2026-03-10

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

::1:: APHC010244802024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA I.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND WRIT PETITION NO: 12191/2024 Between: 1. PATTAMSETTI SRINIVASU, S/O.VENKATA NARAYANA, AGED 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT SETTIPETA VILLAGE NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, E.G.DIST., 2. BONGURI RAJARAO, S/O.MUSALLAYA, AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT TALLAPALEM VILLAGE NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, E.G.DIST., 3. PATTAMSETTI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.GANANNA, AGED 52 YEARS. RESIDING AT SETTIPETA VILLAGE NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, E.G.DIST., 4. PATTAMSETTI SUBBA RAO, S/O.VARADAYYA, AGED 65 YEARS. RESIDING AT SETTIPETA VILLAGE, NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, E.G.DIST., 5. PATTAMSETTI SURYAVATHI, W/O.SATYANARAYANA (LATE) AGED 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT SETTIPETA VILLAGE NIDADAVOLE MANDAL, E.G.DIST., ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS SECRETARIAT ::2:: VELAGAPUDI. 2. SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA VARIDEVASATHANAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN ANTHARVEDI VILLAGE SAGINETIPALLI MANDAL 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA VARIDEVASATHANAM ANTHARVEDI VILLAGE SAGINETIPALLI MANDAL DR.B.R.AMBEDKARKONSEEMA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities inparticular the chairman and the executive officer to conduct lease for the 3 years(2024 to 2026) in respect of the land situated in survey No.218 of an extent of Ac.4.07Cents, Settipeta village, in Nidadavole Mandal, which has been in possession of the petitioners for over 7 decades, through the impuned notice dated 05-05-202 alleged to have been affixed in the panchayath office, as illegal. arbitrary, Malafide, violation of principal of natural justice, Constitutional provisions including 14,21 etc., and the endowments Act. Etc.,and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3. KANDA SRINIVASU SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (KS AND WG) ::3:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA I.A.No.1 of 2025 IN/AND WRIT PETITION NO: 12191/2024 This Court made the following COMMON ORDER: Ms. P. Satya Haritha, learned counsel representing Smt. Nimmagadda Revathi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the pending writ petition the petitioners herein filed O.A challenging the action of the respondents before the lower Tribunal under Section 87 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, in which heard the matter and passed the order of status-quo. As such, no further orders are necessary and seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Permission for withdrawal is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 4. In view of withdrawal of the present Writ Petition, I.A.No.1 of 2025 is closed. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J DT: 11.03.2026 krk ::4:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.12191 of 2024 DT: 11.03.2026 krk 97