Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20906 (CAL)

SARAT CHANDRA SIL v. SANTOSH KUMAR SIL

COT/1/2021 · 2026-05-19

Debangsu Basak, Md Shabbar Rashidi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.05.2026 Item No.7 with 8 with 9 Court No.37 CHC In The High Court at Calcutta Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side FA/472/2025 IA NO: CAN/5/2021 CAN/8/2026 Santosh Kumar Sil Vs. Mita Sil & Ors (Sarat Chandra Sil since deceased) With COT/1/2021 With FA/473/2025 IA NO: CAN/5/2025 Mr. Suresh Kumar Sahoo, Advocate Ms. Aparna Dhali, Advocate …for the appellant 1. Prayer for adjournment made on behalf of the appellant is considered and refused. 2. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant is requested to proceed with the appeal who is not in a position to do. 3. In such circumstances, FA/472/2025, FA/473/2025 along with cross-objection and connected applications are dismissed for default. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)