NIKHIL CHAMAN AGARWAL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APEAL/19/2025 · 2026-10-19
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20900 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20900 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 30-APEAL 19-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.19 OF 2025 Nikhil Chaman Agarwal … Appellant Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents ----- None for the Appellant. Mr. V. N. Sagare, APP for Respondent No.1-State. PSI Sachin Phadatare, Nizampura PS is present. ----- CORAM :
N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE :
19TH OCTOBER 2026 P.C. :
1. This Appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 takes exception to the order dated 01st January 2025 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwandi in Anticipatory Bail Application No.1096 of
2024.
2. By the impugned order, the Learned Additional Sessions Judge has rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by the present Appellant, who came to be arrested in Crime No.890 of 2024 registered at Nizampura Police Station, Bhiwandi for the offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short “SC & ST Act”). Mugdha 1 of 2 MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Digitally signed by MUGDHA MANOJ PARANJAPE Date: 2026.10.19 17:51:07 +0530
2 30-APEAL 19-25.doc
3. Learned APP for the Respondent-State, on instructions, submits that in the present crime, the prosecution has filed the ‘B’ summary.
4. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present Appeal and the same is disposed of.
5. However, liberty is granted to the Appellant to file fresh application for anticipatory bail in the event ‘B’ summary is not accepted.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.) Mugdha 2 of 2