[2026:RJ-JP:1841] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16790/2025 Ashok Kumar S/o Bhojraj, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Majra Rawat, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli Bahrod. (At Present Confined At Sub Jail Kotputli-Bahrod, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16791/2025 Ghanshyam Gurjar S/o Mohanlal Gurjar, R/o Majra Rawat, Police Station Bansur District Kotputali- Behror. (Accused In Sub Jail, Behror). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj P. Sharma, with Ms. Sneha Gulati Ms. Nikita Sharma Ms. Shruti Chandgothia Mr. Ramesh Choudhary Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP Mr. Rajveer Gurjar, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/01/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 343/2025, registered with the Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror [2026:RJ-JP:1841] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16790/2025] for offences punishable u/S 109(1), 324(4), 3(5) of B.N.S. 2023 and u/S 5 & 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and the counsel for the complainant. 4. As per contents of the FIR, only the presence of the accused- petitioners has been found at the place of the incident but no any overt act has been assigned to them or any allegation of committing any criminal act has been specified. 5. The accused-petitioners are said to be in custody since 27.11.2025. The accused petitioner co-accused Bheemraj @ Kalu has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 09.01.2026 passed in CRLMB No. 167/2026. On perusal of the contents of the FIR, the case of the present accused petitioners is in no manner distinguishable from the case of the co-accused Bheemraj @ Kalu, who has already been enlarged on bail. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and also the fact that no any specific allegation has been made against them and no injury has been sustained by the complainant party in the incident, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. [2026:RJ-JP:1841] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16790/2025] 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. A copy of this order be placed in connected file(s). (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /15-16