GAGAN DEEP SHARMA v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CWP/18087/2026 · 2026-05-29
Tribhuvan Dahiya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20897 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20897 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-18087-2026
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No. 134
CWP-18087-2026
Decided on:29.05.2026 Gagan Deep Sharma
. . . Petitioner Versus
State of Haryana and others
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
PRESENT: Mr. Ravinder Singh Dhull, Advocate
for the petitioner.
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL)
The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari setting aside the announcement dated 12.05.2026 and the order dated 13.05.2026, Annexures P-20 and P-21, respectively, whereby the petitioner’s candidature for the post of Vice Principal (Group-B) against advertisement 15/2024 has been rejected for want of requisite experience in supervisory capacity.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner against the rejection, bringing to notice of the Commission the relevant orders whereby he was assigned charge of the institution in supervisory capacity has not been decided as yet. At this stage, he will be satisfied in case respondent no.2 is directed to decide his pending representation, dated 12.11.2025, Annexure P-14, before holding interviews for the post.
MEHAK HURIA 2026.05.29 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
CWP-18087-2026
-2-
3.
Notice of motion.
4.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Haryana/State accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State. Mr. Gurnoor S. Sandhu, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.2/Commission and submits that the pending representation, dated 12.11.2025, will be decided by respondent no.2 by passing a speaking order before holding of interviews for the post, in accordance with law.
5.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
6.
Ordered accordingly.
(TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) 29.05.2026
JUDGE Mehak
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No
MEHAK HURIA 2026.05.29 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment